When            the FDA and the Texas Medical Board went after Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski            in 1996, Sgt. Rick Schiff, an 11 year veteran of the Tampa Police Dept.            testified before a US Congressional hearing on Feb. 29, 1996 about losing            one twin daughter to a highly malignant brain tumor that traveled throughout            her brain and spine. 
Doctors            said they had two options: take her home and let her die, or use massive            doses of chemo and radiation simultaneously. In either event she was            going to die—and very quickly. The Schiffs agreed to the therapy.            Six months later, she was still alive—and still dying of cancer.            Schiff and his wife began digging for alternatives. They found Dr. Stanislaw            Burzynski. 
Eighteen            months later, after being treated by Dr. Burzynski, she was still alive—and            she was cancer free. A new tumor showed up. Against the advise of their            local oncologist who insisted Burzynski's treatment failed, they put            her back on Burzynski's treatment. In 9 weeks, the tumor was completely            gone. Schiff's daughter died in July, 1995 of neurological necrosis.            
Her            brain simply fell apart from the prolonged use of radiation. The autopsy            showed she was completely cancer-free. Out of 52 case of that disease—ever,            no one died cancer-free, just Chrissie Schiff. Schiff told Congress            that she didn't die of a terminal illness. She died, he said "...of            my inability to care for her properly. She died from bad advise. She            died because there is a government institution that disseminates false            information and is not looking out for the best interests of the people."
Those            who have crossed horns with the FDA over the years were quick to realize            that particular federal agency serves as a corrupt enforcer of both            Big Pharma and the American Medical Association. Both—Big Pharma            and the AMA—use campaign contributions to control politicians            into writing regulations that favor the agenda of Big Pharma, and stifle            medical doctor and medical research scientists who are too innovative            to make sure their discoveries don't harm the practice of treating disease            by eradicating the diseases from which the medical community earns its            livelihood. The way Big Pharma and the AMA talk about cancer research            you'd almost think they are serious about eradicating cancer. They are            serious about finding new, more effective treatments for cancer, and            for prolonging the life of cancer patients, but regardless of the medical            rhetoric, finding a real cure for cancer is not on the Christmas wish            of the AMA since treating cancer is big business. Curing cancer—particularly            as quickly and effectively as Burzynski's cancer gene therapy does—would            drain a large chunk of the massive amount of revenue received by cancer            treatment centers for chemotherapy and radiation treatment.
Big            Pharma, on the other hand, is working hard to find a pharmaceutical            "cure" for cancer, and have several drugs now which are used            to treat specific types of cancers. Today Big Pharma uses Zolinza            (to treat T-cell lymphoma), Xeloda (to treat metastatic breast            cancer and for colon cancer patients whose colon has already been removed),            and Avastin (used to treat kidney cancer, brain cancer and lung cancer—and            metastatic colon cancer but only when used with intravenous chemotherapy).            
However,            Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, an internationally known cancer research physician            was one of the early, and most successful, pioneers of cancer gene research.            Burzynski is credited with the discovery of the molecular switch that            allows him to turn off cancer cells without destroying normal cells.            Unlike Big Pharma, however, Dr. Burzynski discovered that killing cancer            is not a "one size fits all" treatment. For example, the cancer            drugs noted above were created by Big Pharma to treat very specific            types of cancer, suggesting the FDA believes that these drugs will not            work on other types of cancer, so under FDA protocol, they are used            only to treat the types of cancers for which the FDA has defined them            to be prescribed.
Dr.            Julian Whitaker, MD, of the Whitaker Wellness Institute has            examined Burzynski's case studies and the findings of the National Cancer            institute with respect to those case histories. He is on the record            as saying: "It was obvious to me that Dr. Burzynski had made            the most important discovery in cancer treatment—ever! It's what            we have been looking for." 
Burzynski            is a native of Poland. He attended Lublin Medical University            where he graduated first in his class on Feb. 18, 1967—at 24 years            of age. He received his Ph.D in biochemistry the following year. While            working towards his biochemistry Ph.D, Burzynski made a profound discovery—a            string of peptides in human blood and urine that had never been discovered            in biomedical research. As he continued his research, Dr. Burzynski            also discovered that people with cancer lacked these peptides in both            their blood and urine, while those who are cancer-free have an abundance            of them. Whitaker viewed that discovery as being similar to waking up            one morning and discovering a whole bunch of islands just off the coast            of Miami, Florida. His discovery has led to a branch of medicine in            what is now known as personalized cancer gene therapy.
Under            the Burzynski protocol, the approved gene therapy drugs are customized            based on the molecular characteristic of that patient's genes and the            cancer itself. While the medical community today is just beginning to            explore this technology, Dr. Burzynski has been practicing it for almost            two decades—one of them in court fighting the FDA and the Texas            Medical Board. The Texas Medical Board has been trying            since 1986 to revoke Burzynski's medical license for, I guess, curing            cancer instead of just treating it like the rest of the medical community.            
His            clinic performs a molecular cancer genome on the patient. From the results,            they create a molecular profile to identify which genes are allowing            cancer to grow in the patient's body. Based on the data received, Burzynski            prescribes the best personalized combination of drugs from a wide array            of FDA approved gene-targeted medications providing his patient with            a uniquely-individualized treatment. 
The            patient in the primary video (above), Chris Onuekwuski, a geo-tech engineer            who lives in Austin, TX. He had colon cancer. Based on the type of cancer            he had, and the fact that he refused to have surgery or chemotherapy,            none of these drugs were FDA-approved to treat his cancer. But, based            on Onuekwuski's genetic markers, the computer model picked those drugs            to kill his cancer in 2007. In less than three months after he began            personalized gene-targeted cancer therapy, Chris Onuekwuski was cancer-free.            The MD Anderson Cancer Center told him that without colon surgery,            he was going to die.
After            a ten year court battle that ended in the Texas Supreme Court in 1996            that resulted in a "not guilty" verdict for Dr. Burzynski            the Texas Medical Board, pressured by the FDA and the AMA,            is back for another try. 
The            Texas Medical Board has scheduled a new hearing to revoke Burzynski's            medical license. If it succeeds it will, very likely, result in Antineoplaston            not gaining FDA approval. This, of course, will set personalized gene            therapy back another decade. If it's not approved, you can bet that            once Burzynski's patent-rights to Antineoplaston expire, Big            Pharma will grab the patent rights and claim they have discovered a            universal cancer cure—that only the elite and the favored can            afford.
The            FDA fought to destroy the herbal cancer cure "discovered"            by a horse on John Hoxsey's farm in Illinois around 1890, managing to            outlaw the Hoxsey cancer cure in the United States in 1968. They are            now knee deep in their second battle to revoke Dr. Burzynski's medical            license for no other reason than his success in curing cancer using            personalized gene therapy. The FDA insists it's because he is using            non-FDA approved gene therapy drugs. What they mean is that he is not            using them to target the types of cancer they approved the drug for.            He is using them, very successfully, to kill the cancers killing his            patients through personalized cancer gene therapy that matches specific            drugs with the genetic makeup of the specific cancer cells attacking            a specific patient.
Burzynski            knows its because one of his patients, Chris Onuekwuski, declined the            colon surgery recommended by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer            Center. He was told the surgery was the only thing that would prolong            his life. Onuekwuski told a physician's assistant from the MD Anderson            Center that the Burzynski Clinic would use gene therapy to treat his            cancer. Onuekwuski said that when he told the PA that "...everything            went quiet. You could hear a pin drop. And that was it. So, I said,            forget MD Anderson."
Burzynski            won his original ten year fight against the Texas Medical Board,            being found not guilty by the Texas Supreme Court. Next April the Medical            Board will try again to pull his medical license for using a host of            gene therapy drugs in ways not approved by the FDA—in particular,            the use of non-approved drug—a substitute for his non-FDA approved            Antineoplaston—by using the FDA-approved drug, Pheylbutyraten            (also known as PB), for it. Pheylbutyraten is FDA-approved            for a specific type of leukemia, but it's not FDA-approved for colon            cancer. Nor were any of the other gene therapy drugs Burzynski used            to cure Oruekwuski's colon cancer. They were prescribed based entirely            on Oruekwuski's genetic markers.
Richard            Jaffe, the defense lawyer for the Burzynski Clinic, said that cancer            establishment's idea is that "...once we tell you that you            are going to die, you have to die. You can't do anything else. When            you have 550 thousand people who are dying of a disease every year,            why should the cancer-chemotherapist tell you there's nothing more you            can do? Why shouldn't that be your choice rather than the cancer establishment?            And that's really what's involved in this case."
In            July, 2006 Bettye White, who had previously been diagnosed with Merkle            cell cancer at the University of Tennessee Medical Center,            and who had received chemotherapy without lasting results, was told            by Dr. Eric Carlson, MD, the head of Oncology at the Medical Center            she needed another chemotherapeutic treatment for her recurring Merkle            cell cancer. At that time, she and her husband did some research on            the Internet and found Dr. Burzynski's clinic in Houston.
After            building a a molecular cancer genome on Mrs. Wright, Burzynski prescribed            Sutent, a gene-targeted cancer medicine that is FDA approved            for kidney cancer, stomach cancer and some forms of pancreatic cancer.            But not Merkle cell throat cancer. Along with Sutent, the protocol also            added PB. When the Wright's returned to Dr. Carlson's office for their            post-treatment follow-up visit, all of the tumors under Bettye Wright's            chin and in her throat were gone.
Carlson's            view of Dr. Burzynski? "I think he's out of the box, and that's            what Mrs. Wright needed. She needed some fresh ideas, and that's what            has resulted in her success. Someone took a chance and applied an off-label            use to a medication that is used everyday in our cancer center, but            not in this application and it has shown some lasting benefits."
Someone            "took a chance?" Meaning, even though the computer            molecular cancer genome indicated the best chance to save the lives,            and cure the cancers that were killing people like Bettye White and            Chris Onuekwuski and scores of other gene therapy patients who found            the Burzynski Clinic, was the off-label use of FDA-approved            cancer therapy drugs—simply because the FDA did not prescribe            them for the types of cancer they were used to cure, it became an offense            justifying the revocation of a trained physician's medical license—for            saving lives? If that's the case, it is time to get rid of the FDA.            Now. That needs to be a pledge made by each and every GOP candidate            for President. And, Congress needs to make the same pledge—and            carry through on it.
Has            science in the United States returned to the days of Copernicus and            Christopher Columbus where innovation—scientifically-correct innovation—is            punished and mediocrity is both protected and rewarded? When the medical            bureaucracy becomes more powerful than the people it's time for the            people, using whatever legal, constitutional forced is necessary, to            rid themselves of the bureaucracy. 
"This            stuff," Dr. Carlson said, "is not taught to you in medical            school. The medical curriculum we all go through is traditional and            very vanilla. And they don't teach you this level of thinking. It goes            one step beyond."
Burzynski's            lawyer, Richard Jaffe said, "What we know is that ten years            from now there will be...multi-agent gene-targeted therapy. There's            going to be that. Everyone's going to get genetic testing, but that's            ten years down the road." Ten years too late for hundreds            of thousands of people who will needlessly die from cancers that can            easily be cured today but for an archaic medical monitoring system that            is so full of itself because it possesses the self-empowered authority            to deny lifesaving medical care because the princes of the medical care            industry are content with an outdated status quo that allows them to            play God. 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment